We've updated our Privacy Policy to make it clearer how we use your personal data. We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. You can read our Cookie Policy here.

Advertisement

Why Does One Earbud Always Die Before the Other? These Researchers Want to Find Out

A man looks to the side while tapping a wireless earbud in his ear.
Credit: Jonas Schindler / Unsplash.
Listen with
Speechify
0:00
Register for free to listen to this article
Thank you. Listen to this article using the player above.

Want to listen to this article for FREE?

Complete the form below to unlock access to ALL audio articles.

Read time: 2 minutes

If you’re a wireless headphone user, you’re probably familiar with the frustration that comes with one earphone’s battery running out well before the other gets flat.


But what is it that makes these batteries degrade so unevenly?


Scientists have been studying battery degradation and lifespan issues for as long as batteries have existed. However, conventional battery failure analysis usually takes place in controlled laboratory settings that might not be reflective of real-world electronics use.


To bridge that gap — and hopefully answer the question of why his left earbud always outlives his right one — Yijin Liu, PhD, an assistant professor at the University of Texas at Austin, is investigating how batteries degrade when they are housed inside electronics.


With the collaboration of a network of researchers from around the world, Liu led a recent study investigating the degradation of batteries inside wireless earbuds. Published in Advanced Materials, the study found that other components housed inside the earbud, such as the Bluetooth antenna or a microphone, can generate a temperature gradient during normal use that may damage battery health.


To learn more about in-device battery analysis, Technology Networks spoke with Liu about this research and how its findings could apply to other types of electronics that we encounter in our daily lives.  

Alexander Beadle (AB):

What prompted you to start investigating how batteries behave when they are inside a device?


Yijin Liu, PhD (YL):

Batteries exhibit complex behavior across multiple scales. While academic research has advanced battery technology from the material to the cell level, real-world applications require integration into larger systems.


This system-level packaging creates a microenvironment that directly affects cell performance, exposing a crucial gap between fundamental research and practical deployment. Meanwhile, industry research and development operates at a rapid pace and often lacks the bandwidth to deeply investigate underlying mechanisms across various length scales. Addressing this gap is essential and it is the motivation behind this work.



AB:

What kind of external factors might affect a battery?


YL:

In our investigation of this earbud, we found that the battery's degradation pattern is affected by surrounding device components, such as the printed circuit and microphone. These components generate heat, leading to a temperature gradient that accelerates battery degradation.



AB:

Why is in-device battery analysis an important avenue of investigation?


YL:

As mentioned earlier, device and system packaging create a microenvironment that directly influences battery behavior. The performance patterns observed in a stand-alone cell differ from those seen in a fully integrated device, indicating that some laboratory-based testing and analysis may be overly simplified and not fully representative of real-world conditions.


Battery degradation is a highly complex process, driven by the interplay of micromorphology, crystal structure, oxidation state and other factors. To capture these intricacies, we employed multimodal characterization techniques to analyze the battery material. Our findings reveal a tightly interconnected chemomechanical interplay, significantly influenced by local temperature gradients.



AB:

What kind of techniques did you employ to “see” inside the earbuds and study their batteries?


YL:

As one can see from the author list, this was quite a heroic effort involving more than 20 researchers from 7 different institutions. We utilized experimental capabilities at the University of Texas at Austin (Texas, USA), SLAC National Lab (California, USA), Brookhaven National Lab (New York, USA), Argonne National Lab (Illinois, USA) and the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility (France).


The transmission X-ray microscopy beamline at the Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Lightsource revealed chemical heterogeneity within individual particles, each just a few micrometers in size. The hard X-ray nanoprobe beamline at Brookhaven National Laboratory enabled nanoscale probing of local phase transitions, a key indicator of material degradation.


At Argonne National Laboratory, the hard X-ray spectroscopy beamline provided insights into atomic bonding and its evolution over the battery’s lifespan. Meanwhile, the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility allowed us to analyze thousands of particles, offering valuable statistical insights into the broader material behavior.



AB:

While your study focused on batteries in headphones, are there any lessons here that are relatable to electronics more broadly?


YL:

These findings are especially relevant – and perhaps even more critical – when considering larger systems like electric vehicle (EV) battery packs, where design flexibility introduces additional complexities. If a temperature gradient is unavoidable, one potential approach is to implement a cooling system with a controlled gradient to mitigate its effects.


Furthermore, this study originated from the observation of capacity decay, but it is equally important to assess the implications from a safety perspective. A key question arises: does a degraded cell have a higher risk of thermal runaway? This remains a crucial research topic, particularly in the context of second-life battery applications, such as repurposing retired EV packs for household energy storage. Ensuring safety in such scenarios requires careful evaluation. Our ongoing research continues to explore these critical challenges.